Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 460

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....<br>Huluvadi G. Ramesh And Anita Sumanth, JJ. For Petitioner : Mr.J. Shankarraman For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Srinivas ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Huluvadi G.Ramesh,J.) This Writ Petition is filed to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Final order No.22/2007 dated 8.1.07/Misc.Order No.13/2007 dated 8.1.07 and consequently direct the first respondent to h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore the CESTAT/1st respondent, who, on hearing the appeals remanded the case for denovo consideration. 3. The second respondent passed Order-in-Original No.8/2006 dated 24.5.2005 demanding a sum of Rs. 35,66,107/- towards differential duty and imposed penalty of Rs. 35,66,107/- and also ordered recovery of interest at the rate of 18% provided under Rule 96ZO(3) of Central Excise Rules, 1944. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....respondent on 4.1.2007. Since the High Court did not order anything, the petitioner filed a letter dated 3.1.2007 before the first respondent . The counsel on record also sought for time on the ground that he was ill. The first respondent dismissed the appeal vide Final Order No.22 of 2007 dated 8.1.2007 on the ground that a medical certificate was not produced in proof of the counsel&#39;s illnes....