2017 (3) TMI 460
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....<br>Huluvadi G. Ramesh And Anita Sumanth, JJ. For Petitioner : Mr.J. Shankarraman For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Srinivas ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Huluvadi G.Ramesh,J.) This Writ Petition is filed to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Final order No.22/2007 dated 8.1.07/Misc.Order No.13/2007 dated 8.1.07 and consequently direct the first respondent to h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fore the CESTAT/1st respondent, who, on hearing the appeals remanded the case for denovo consideration. 3. The second respondent passed Order-in-Original No.8/2006 dated 24.5.2005 demanding a sum of Rs. 35,66,107/- towards differential duty and imposed penalty of Rs. 35,66,107/- and also ordered recovery of interest at the rate of 18% provided under Rule 96ZO(3) of Central Excise Rules, 1944. T....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....respondent on 4.1.2007. Since the High Court did not order anything, the petitioner filed a letter dated 3.1.2007 before the first respondent . The counsel on record also sought for time on the ground that he was ill. The first respondent dismissed the appeal vide Final Order No.22 of 2007 dated 8.1.2007 on the ground that a medical certificate was not produced in proof of the counsel's illnes....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI