2013 (10) TMI 1451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of 2013 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>Pankaj Mithal, J. Counsel for Applicant :Rahul Agarwal, Bharat Ji Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party : C.S.C. ORDER Pankaj Mithal, J. The two revisions arise from the same order of the tribunal dated 27.9.1993 and as such are taken up together. Heard Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal assisted by Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionists a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....revisionists have preferred this revision contending that the seizure itself is illegal and bad in law. Therefore, the demand of security is unjustified. It is admitted that the goods were seized solely on the ground that the revenue was of the opinion that the consignor and consignee both were non-existing and not genuine. In a series of decisions it has been held that the existence of the ....