Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (10) TMI 1451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tax<br>-<br>Pankaj Mithal, J. Counsel for Applicant :Rahul Agarwal, Bharat Ji Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party : C.S.C. ORDER Pankaj Mithal, J. The two revisions arise from the same order of the tribunal dated 27.9.1993 and as such are taken up together. Heard Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal assisted by Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionists and Sri U.K. Pandey, learned Standing Cou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ending that the seizure itself is illegal and bad in law. Therefore, the demand of security is unjustified. It is admitted that the goods were seized solely on the ground that the revenue was of the opinion that the consignor and consignee both were non-existing and not genuine. In a series of decisions it has been held that the existence of the consignor or the consignee or their registration w....