2017 (3) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arg, D.R. Present for the Respondent: Mr. Z.U. Alvi, Advocate ORDER The Department-Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order dated 25.05.2011 of Commissioner (Appeals), Bhopal. The respondent is engaged in the business of developing windfarm and related activities. The dispute in the present case relates to development of the windfarm with a capacity to install 25 wind mills at Kada....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder, the Revenue is in appeal. 2. The Id. A.R. elaborated the grounds of appeal against the impugned order. She submitted that the respondent had provided various taxable services in creating infrastructure in the said wind farm. The MOU clearly demarcates the   obligations on the part of the respondent. It is clear that the respondent acted as a contractor to execute these works. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent obtained the land and has right over the development of such land to generate wind power. For financing the project they have entered into the said MOU with M/s. Vestas RRB, so that the required wind mills can be supplied by the other party without payment being made by the respondent. The arrangement is the amount shall be collected from the potential investors, who will become interested in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y such service. Wherever services are provided like maintenance, repair etc. of the wind farm the respondents are discharging service tax. 5.  We have heard both sides and perused the appeal records. 6.  The impugned order examined the MOU under the scope of the wind mill project as promoted by the respondent. On factual appreciation of the back ground of the case, it is  reco....