Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant, M/s. Wave Industries Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of Sugar and Molasses. Pursuant to audit, the Superintendent of Central Excise vide his letter dated 24-6-2008 demanded payment of Service Tax on the transport charges incurred by the appellant for transportation of sugarcane from the 'Cane Coll....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....half of appellant urges that the demand is bad as under the facts and circumstances, extended period of limitation was not invocable. Secondly, on merits the transporters or individuals, who used their own trucks and not issued any consignment note or GR. Further, it was obligation of the farmer to deliver the sugarcane at their factory gate. The appellant have only facilitated the farmer in carry....