2017 (2) TMI 1174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ms. Rinki Arora (Advocate) for the Respondent Per B. Ravichandran: The Revenue is in appeal against order dated 3.12.2010 of Commissioner (Appeals), Bhopal. The Respondent are engaged mainly in printing flex board as per the requirements of the clients. The Revenue entertained a view that printing and preparation of such flex boards and subsequent delivery and mounting it in the required....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... where the Hon'ble Supreme Court remanded the matter for a fresh decision. As such no ratio has been laid down in the said decision. Further, it is contended that the activities undertaken by the Respondent in creating the flex board and helping the display of the same in the required site is covered under the overall ambit of the tax entry for advertising agency. The flex board created in as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arding, glow sign boards and signages as per the specification of customer. They also undertake work of installation of the same at site and recovered the amounts from their clients for the said services. The impugned order examined illustrative work orders and concluded that printing of flex boards based on the contents supplied by the customer will not be covered by the scope of advertising agen....