2013 (12) TMI 1623

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsultant, for the Appellant. Dr. Devender Singh, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Rakesh Kumar, Member (T)]. - The appellant, a company based in Korea entered into an agreement with M/s. Samcor Glass Ltd., Kota for transfer of technology and technical assistance for manufacture of colour picture tubes for which they charged royalty. The department treating the services prov....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CE reported in 2005 (186) E.L.T. (161) (Tribunal) = 2006 (3) S.T.R. 665 (Tribunal), Hero Honda reported in 2006 TIOL 19 and CCE v. Veleo Friction Material India Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2005 (185) E.L.T. 78 (Tribunal) = 2006 (3) S.T.R. 588 (Tribunal). This order of the Addl. Commissioner was reviewed by the Commissioner vide review order dated 8-12-2008, by which he held that the transfer of technolo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sections 76 and 77 ibid. Against this order of the Commissioner, this appeal has been filed. 2. Heard both the sides. 3. Shri R. Murlidharan, Consultant, ld. Counsel for the appellant, pleaded that firstly the transfer of technology under Technical Collaboration/licence agreement against royalty payment is not covered by consulting engineer's service, that this activity become tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellant is a company located in Korea and have no branch or any establishment in India. In respect of a taxable service provided by an offshore service provider not having any branch office or establishment in India to a person in India, Service Tax could be charged from the service recipient in India w.e.f. 18-4-2006. But neither during the period prior to 18-4-2006 or during period w.e.f. 1....