2017 (2) TMI 969
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondents : Mr. A. P. Srinivas ORDER 1. Issue Notice. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsels for parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. The instant writ petition has been directed against the order dated 21.12.2016, passed by the Superintendent of Central Excise (Servi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s appropriated. 4. To be noted, the said show cause notice pertains to the period December, 2008 to January, 2010. The show cause notice, which was adjudicated vide order in original dated 14.10.2016, pertained to the period spanning between April, 2008 and March, 2010. Via the order in original dated 14.10.2016, the demand amounting to Rs. 29,16,716/- qua service tax was confirmed against the pe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....,100/- 1,48,00,100/- --- MAY 08 5,03,54,000/- 5,03,54,000/- --- JUNE 08 1,20,70,000/- 1,20,70,000/- --- JULY 08 3,19,07,325/- 3,19,07,325/- ---- AUGUST 08 2,11,50,000/- 2,11,50,000/- --- SEPT 08 45,20,000/- 45,20,000/- --- OCT 08 44,01,500/- 44,01,500/- --- NOV 08 31,20,000/- 31,20,000/- --- DEC 08 82,12,500/- Nil 82,12,500/- JAN 09 42,47,500/-....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ned counsel for the petitioner that the requirement of pre-deposit of 7.5% of the service tax stands fully covered. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that these aspects were sought to be brought to the attention of the concerned authority, broadly, in the petitioner's representation dated 16.12.2016. 7.1. The grievance of the petitioner, is that, the impugned order does not advert t....