2017 (2) TMI 969
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ted against the order dated 21.12.2016, passed by the Superintendent of Central Excise (Service Tax Appeals II). By virtue of this order, the petitioner's appeal against the order in original dated 14.10.2016, has been returned upon purported failure to comply with the requirements of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty. In this behalf, in the impugned order, reference is made to Section 35F of the Central Excise Act and 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that prior to the show cause notice dated 09.02.2012, which was the subject matter of the order in original dated 14.10.2016, an earlier show cause notice dated 12.10.2011, was issued. 3.1. It is stated that the said show ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0/- 1,20,70,000/- --- JULY 08 3,19,07,325/- 3,19,07,325/- ---- AUGUST 08 2,11,50,000/- 2,11,50,000/- --- SEPT 08 45,20,000/- 45,20,000/- --- OCT 08 44,01,500/- 44,01,500/- --- NOV 08 31,20,000/- 31,20,000/- --- DEC 08 82,12,500/- Nil 82,12,500/- JAN 09 42,47,500/- 1,95,000/- 40,52,500/- FEB 10 1,52,47,500/- Nil 1,52,47,500/- MAR 10 1,90,50,000/- Nil 1,90,50,000/- TOTAL 18,90,80,425/- 14,25,17,925/- 4,65,62,500/- TAX LIABILITY ON THIS AMOUNT RS. 19,18,375/- 5.1. Based o....
TaxTMI