2012 (4) TMI 708

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. Shri K.K. Anand, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Mathew John, Member (T)]. - The Applicants have filed this application for rectification of mistakes in Final Order No. 1057/2011-EX, dated 21-12-2011 [2012 (278) E.L.T. 683 (Tri.)] issued disposing of the above stay petition and appeal. 2. We have heard the ld. Counsel for the Applicants who were the re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s in the order and need to be corrected. So the following corrections are ordered in different paragraphs of the order issued as indicated below. 4.1 In para 1 of the order. For the sentence,- "So the requirement of pre-deposit was waived and the appeal itself was taken up for hearing with consent of both sides.", the following sentence,- "So the prayer of Revenue f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... this appeal", the following sentences,- "The adjudicating authority has held that these are two different periods and the latter period is only one day with less than the minimum of 15 days prescribed in Rule 10 and abatement cannot be given on account of that day. Aggrieved by the decision of the adjudicating authority Respondents filed an appeal with Commissioner (Appeals) who held ....