TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (2) TMI 138
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 374/2006/MCH/AC/Gr.2B1/06 dated 18th August 2006. 2. None appeared on behalf of the appellant despite notice. Since the appeal is of 2006, we take up the appeal for disposal. 3. The issue that falls for consideration is whether the lower authorities were correct in enhancing the value of "EUDRAGIT-l 30d-55" (Methacynic Acid Co-Polymer) (hereinafter refe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....upport the order and submits that the identical goods were imported by another importer and the contemporaneous imports details were applied for enhancing the value. It is his submission that the contemporaneous imports details as given by the appellant needs to be verified. 6. On careful consideration of the submission made by both sides, we find that the value sought to be adopted for enhancing....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....orted by appellant is 2160 Kgs. We find that there is definitely substantial difference in the quantity imported by the appellant and another importer. The sheer quantity advantage that appellant has on import of such chemicals could have also influenced the price as the quantity of 480 Kgs. imported by another importer being 25% of quantity imported the same supplier could have charged more. The ....