Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2009 (5) TMI 957

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent  Sh. Ravi Raghavan, Advocate JUDGEMENT Per Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar: The appeal is taken on board in terms of Excise Miscellaneous Application No. 358 of 2009. Heard the learned Advocate for the respondent and learned DR for the appellant. 2. The issue involved in the matter is whether the input credit taken, when the final product was dutiable need not to be reversed ....

PrevPreviousNextNext