TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (1) TMI 1023
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ate, for Appellant Shri T. K. Sikdar, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER The present appeal is filed by the appellant, M/s Vewvox Systems, against the Order-in-Original No. 27-28/Commr./Noida-I/2015-16 dated 13/11/2015 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida-I. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants were engaged in manufacturing of Black & White Tel....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r C. No. V(15)Adj/Noida/Vewvox/72/04/19924 dated 08/11/2004, demanding differential duty of Rs. 61,94,455/- & 46,68,578/- respectively under Section 11A along with interest as chargeable under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944. The said Show Cause Notices were adjudicated through Order-in-Original No. 13-14/Commr./Noida/2005 dated 24/02/2005 wherein demand of duty amounting to Rs. 90,67,968....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....,94,455/- & 46,68,578/- and order the appellant to pay interest and imposed penalty of Rs. 61,94,455/- & 46,68,578/- under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Aggrieved by the said order the appellant has preferred this appeal before this Tribunal. 3. The ld. Counsel for the appellant, Shri B. R. Tripathi, has submitted that the ratio of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) was considered and distinguished by the Hon'ble Supreme Court through their ruling the case of Salora International Ltd. (Supra), we also find that this Tribunal had directed the Original Authority to proceed for De-novo Adjudication in appellant's case with reference to the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Salora International Ltd. (Supra). We do not find any ground advance....