2017 (1) TMI 846

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ms. Neha Garg, DR for the Respondent ORDER Per B. Ravichandran The appeal is against the order dated 26.02.2013 of Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur. The appellants were engaged in providing various taxable services. The dispute in the present appeal relates to service rendered by the appellant for Rajasthan Housing Board, Jaipur with reference to construction of eight Nos. of hou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....olving in project and even otherwise, such service cannot be taxed under Construction of Complex Services. 3. Ld. AR reiterated the findings of the lower authority and relied upon the decision of Tribunal in Madhukar Mittal vs. CCE, Panchkula  2015 (40) STR 969 (Tri. Del.). 4. We have heard both sides and perused the appeal records. We note that the list of contracts which were examined....