2016 (7) TMI 1248
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....vir Singh (Judicial Member) This is an Appeal by the Assessee arising out of the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Mumbai ('CIT(A)' for short) dated 03.9.2014 in Appeal No.CIT(A)-14/TDS-1/IT-29/2012-13, for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2010-11. The penalty under dispute was levied by the Addl. CIT(TDS), Mumbai vide order dated 28.12.2011 u/s. 272A(2)(k) of the Income Tax Act, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....26Q-1st 427 435501 42700 42700 26Q-2nd 335 379701 33500 33500 26Q-3rd 243 353454 24300 24300 26Q-4th 92 402704 9200 9200 Amount levied 1,09,700 4. According to the assessee, the delay occurred due to the compliance guidelines as framed by NSDL - mandatory quoting of 85% deductees Correct Pan numbers, etc., which were newly introduce....
TaxTMI