2017 (1) TMI 692
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dra Jain and Akhilesh K., Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri Hitesh Shah, Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This Larger Bench was constituted for answering the reference made to the Larger Bench by miscellaneous Order No. M/4831/15/CB, dated 27-10-2015 [2016 (331) E.L.T. A88 (Tri.-Mum.)]. The question which was referred to Larger Benc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sic) and referred the matter to the Hon'ble President for answering the above reproduced question. 3. Basically the question which has been referred to the Bench is after rescission of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. vide Notification No. 99/94, dated 1-3-1994, whether the benefits which were extended to the importer would require to satisfy the same even when Notification 64/88-Cus. was in fo....
TaxTMI