TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (1) TMI 685
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as 'Firm' for short) which entered into a contract for providing Architectural Design services to the Respondent - M/s. Nandhini Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'Company' for short), for construction of a Residential Apartment building for them known as "Prakruthi Solitaire" in Phase - I and Phase-II in the Electronic City of Bengaluru, has filed this Winding-up p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion Certificate' was issued vide Annexure G, document (undated) which gave the date of completion of Phase-I of the Project as 'October 2013' of built-up area of 25,500 Sq.mtrs, for which phase-I, their fees was duly paid, but the balance amount was not required to be paid as the petitioner - Firm did not render the 'Professional Services' for the Phase-II of the project of th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aid would be taken towards Phase-II etc., are totally false." 5. The learned counsel for the Respondent - Company also urged that in view of the said Statement of Objections filed by them, there is no 'admitted liability' on the part of the Respondent - Company to pay the said claimed amount of Rs. 99,08,205/- and therefore, the present winding-up petition deserves to be dismissed. He al....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e said professional services of the petitioner, but there appears to be some dispute about the second phase of the project for which the petitioner's services were not continuously engaged by the Respondent - Company. This would also appear from the communication, Annexure H, E-mail dated 27/03/2014 written by one Mr. Ajit Jain, from petitioner - Firm to Mr. Ashok M., who was only a middleman ....