2008 (3) TMI 725

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Thakur, Authorised Representative(JCDR) For the Respondent JUDGEMENT Per S.S.Kang: Heard both sides. The present impugned order has passed in pursuance to the remand order dt.15.4.02 passed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held as under: 'As far as Appeals against impugned order No.36/2000 dt.3.11.2000, is concerned, we find substance in the submission of Shri P.C.Jain, learned Advo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....matter afresh'. 2.The main contention of the appellant is that the present impugned order passed in violation to the principles of natural justice. The contention is that the case of the revenue is that certain incentive sheets showing more production than reflected in R.G.I were recovered from Shri M.L.Agarwal, Dy. General Manager and revenue recorded the statements of various persons to show ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ument the contention of the Revenue is that in addition to the statement recorded during investigation showing higher production. There was other evidence also which shows that the appellants were producing goods which are not reflected in the statutory records 4.We find that the appellant before the adjudicating authority asked for cross examination of the above three witnesses. Their statemen....