2012 (9) TMI 1083

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Vasanti B. Patel ORDER 1. Following questions of law are raised by the revenue in this appeal :- (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, the Tribunal was right in holding that deduction u/s. 80HHC should be computed qua each unit and not qua assessee ? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, the Tribunal was ri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tribunal was right in confirming the order of CIT(A) directing the assessing officer to exclude 90% of net and gross amount of interest receipts from "profits of the business" as per clause (baa) of explanation to Section 80HHC ? (vi) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, the Tribunal was right in holding that deduction u/s.80HHC should be allowed on interest....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ITAT for fresh decision in the light of the decision of this court in the case of Associated Capsules P. Ltd. (supra). 3. As regards question (iii) is concerned, the finding of fact recorded by the ITAT in para 26 of its order is that insurance receipts on the damaged goods had direct nexus with the income of the undertaking and the same has not been excluded from the profits for the purpose o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....estion (vi) is concerned, counsel for the parties state that the said question stands answered against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Grindwell Norton Ltd. reported in [2009] 318 ITR 172 (Bom). Hence the said question cannot be entertained. 6. As regards question (vii) is concerned, counsel for the parties state that the said question stands answered against t....