2017 (1) TMI 91
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....R - For the Appellant Smt. Ezhilmathi, AR - For the Respondent ORDER The appellant has filed two appeals. The issue in both the appeals is identical, therefore both the appeals are being disposed of by this common order. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellant is engaged in the production and clearance of excisable goods falling under Chapter 69 of the Fis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pellant submitted that the impugned order denying the CENVAT credit on outdoor catering as well as rent-a-cab service is wrong and not sustainable in law as the same has been passed by ignoring the judicial precedents. He further submitted that in appellant's own case for an earlier period, this Tribunal vide its judgment reported in 2011 (21) S.T.R. 417 (Tri.-Bang.) has allowed the appeal by hold....
TaxTMI