2016 (12) TMI 1396

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at Raichandani, Advocate for the respondent ORDER This appeal has been filed by Revenue against order-in-appeal no: NSK-EXCUS-000-APP-240-13-14 dated 22nd August 2013 of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nashik in which M/s Sharad N Pawar, who is a provider of 'works contract service', has been held liable to pay service tax of Rs. 20,48,456/- along with interest besides be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er authority. The Learned Authorised Representative placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Board of Control for Cricket in India vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai [2015-TIOL-04-SC-ST]. A number of other decisions on similar lines were also cited by the Learned Authorised Representative. 3. Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the proceedings, even tho....