2016 (12) TMI 1396
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at Raichandani, Advocate for the respondent ORDER This appeal has been filed by Revenue against order-in-appeal no: NSK-EXCUS-000-APP-240-13-14 dated 22nd August 2013 of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nashik in which M/s Sharad N Pawar, who is a provider of 'works contract service', has been held liable to pay service tax of Rs. 20,48,456/- along with interest besides be....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er authority. The Learned Authorised Representative placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Board of Control for Cricket in India vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai [2015-TIOL-04-SC-ST]. A number of other decisions on similar lines were also cited by the Learned Authorised Representative. 3. Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the proceedings, even tho....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI