2016 (12) TMI 654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S. Sharma, and Ms. Sukriti Das, Advocates for the Appellant Shri M.R. Sharma, Authorized Representative (DR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Ashok Jindal The appellants are in appeal against the impugned order, wherein redemption fine on main appellant i.e. M/s Indore CNC Private Ltd. has been imposed and penalties on the co-appellants have been imposed by way of impugned orders. The facts of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed on the appellant. Aggrieved by the said order, appellants are before me. 2. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that as the appellant has already paid duty alongwith interest and same was not contested by the appellants at this stage but the appellants are contesting penalty and redemption fine imposed on them. He submits that as no goods were available, therefore, redemption fine im....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and appellants have not paid duty, therefore, proceedings have rightly been initiated against the appellants. 4. Heard both sides considered the submissions. 5. The payment of duty alongwith interest is not disputed before me and not contested by the appellant before me. The only contest before me is redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellants. 6. As admitted that no goods were avai....