Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant : S. P. Kesarwani, S.S.C. ORDER Heard learned counsel Sri Parv Agarwal for the department and Sri A.P. Mathur for the assessee. This is an appeal filed by the department under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order passed by the tribunal dated 20.8.2010 for the period 31.11.1998 to 31.3.1999 whereby the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed and th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent opted the compounding scheme under Rule 96ZO (3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as Rules) for full and final discharge of their duty liabilities under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as Act). The ACP was finally fixed as 2672.75 MT per annum. For the Financial Year 1998-99 the ACP of respondent Mill was recommended as follows:-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T 75]. On 9.6.2008 pursuant to aforesaid order of the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner of Central Excise passed the order in accordance with law after affording the opportunity of hearing to the assessee. He reconfirmed the order dated 20.4.1999 invoking Rule 5 which provided that in case the annual capacity determined by the formula in sub Rule (3) of Rule 3 in respect of a mill, is less t....