2016 (12) TMI 13
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sh Rohira,for the Petitioners. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Smt Neeta V. Masurkar and Pratik Sexaria,for the Respondents. ORDER P. C. The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade has passed an order on a showcause notice against the Petitioners. That is impugned in the Writ Petition directly and when we were disinclined to entertain it since there is alternate, efficacious remedy of Appeal ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h is annexed as Exhibit-I page 65 to the affidavit in reply. 3 Mr. Jetly appearing on behalf of the Respondents supports the impugned order by contending that ample opportunities were given to remain present but the Petitioners did not avail of the same. In the absence of real prejudice the Petitioners cannot be granted a further opportunity and on that ground the impugned order does not get vi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ate was unavailable. Though, the Petitioners claim that a notice dated 11th June, 2015 scheduling the hearing on 16th June, 2015 was never received, we do not wish to enter into that controversy. As we have noted that the show cause notice remained pending for nearly five years, if one more opportunity had been extended and granted, nothing was lost. In such circumstances, without entering into th....
TaxTMI