2016 (11) TMI 1336
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hri Rajeev Ranjan (Joint Commissioner) A.R. Present for the Respondent: Shri Rajesh Chibber, Advocate Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The Respondent were manufactures of LPG Cylinders and registered with the Central Excise Department and were availing Cenvat Credit facility. The respondent were issued with ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hority did not agree with the same and confirmed the demand. The respondent preferred appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) who vide Order-in-Appeal No. 302/14-15 dated 29.12.2014 set aside the Order-in-Original and allowed appeal filed before him. 2. Aggrieved by the order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) Revenue is before this Tribunal with a prayer to set aside order passed by Ld. Com....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e case of Commissioner of Central Excise Ghaziabad Vs. M/s UP Telelinks, in which exactly same point was settled by holding that removal of inputs does not amount to trading Rule 3 (5) of Cenvat Credit Rules provide that if inputs are removed as such, the assessee is required to reverse only Cenvat credit availed on such inputs. 5. I have taken rival contention into consideration and I am of th....
TaxTMI