2016 (11) TMI 1283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i, Advocate for the appellant R.K. Manjhi, A.R. for the respondent ORDER Per B. Ravichandran The appeal is against the order dated 29.09.2009 of Commissioner (A) Indore. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of dry battery cell liable to central excise duty. They were availing Cenvat Credit of duty paid on inputs and capital goods as well as services. 2. Paper and paper board ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... We find that the appellant is not engaged in the manufacture of any paper or paper board. These items were their inputs procured after payment of Cenvat Credit duty. These inputs were put to intended use in appellant s factory. In such a situation this is not tenable to hold that appellant was engaged in the manufacture of waste and scrap of paper. We note the similar dispute was before the Trib....