2016 (11) TMI 1078
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Appeal. The order is pronounced on 31.01.2013. It is received by the Department on 02.02.2013. Admittedly, the limitation expired on 2.05.2013. Thereafter what is stated is as follows: "3. That after receiving the copy of the judgment dated 31.1.2013, the matter was discussed at different levels in the department. 4. That though the department had initiated the necessary steps in time for ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n were in Hindi, it was directed such documents in Hindi language upon which the department relies upon, should also be accompanied by their English translation. Since there was no authorised translator in the department as well as in the office of the Chief Standing Counsel, it took some time to translate the documents." 2. We find no reasonable explanation for the delay, particularly for the pe....