2016 (11) TMI 748

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndakumar For the Respondents : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai ORDER Heard Mrs.Aparna Nandakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader accepting notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition challenging the Goods D....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6.04.2016, which is challenged in this Writ Petition. 4. Before going into the contentions raised by the first respondent in the counter affidavit, it has to be seen as to what was the reason for detaining the goods at the first instance while issuing goods detention notice. The reason assigned in the notice was that the goods are transported from Chennai to Madhya Pradesh and the amount quoted....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2016. 6. So far as the two vehicles bearing with Registration Numbers RJ48GB0391 & RJ27GA2323, have passed the Tamil Nadu Check Post and they were carrying only photostat copies of the invoice, but accompanied by the original Form LL. So far as the present consignment is concerned, the only reason mentioned in the Detention Notice dated 01.04.2016, was that there was variation in the quantity. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....voice was split up into three. The respondent has not disputed the fact that two of the consignments have already moved from the State of Tamil Nadu and so far as the impugned consignment is concerned, it was accompanied by proper documents and the explanation given by the petitioner for the variation in the quantity was reasonable and there is nothing on record to show that the said explanation w....