2016 (2) TMI 956
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Nandakumar and P. Gopinatha Menon, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER [Judgment per : Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.]. - This appeal is by the Union of India and others. We have heard learned Senior Standing Counsel for C.B.E. & C. and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The issue raised before the learned Single Judge was as to whether the respondent writ petitioner was eligib....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Directions were issued to consider all applications pending as on 5-5-2005 as if they were filed after that date. 3. Hearing the learned Senior Standing Counsel for C.B.E. & C. and the learned counsel for the respondent, it can be seen that the entire issue revolves on interpretation of Ext.P11. While the learned Senior Standing Counsel for C.B.E. & C. argued that Ext.P11 contains such cl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....5 as a relevant date for giving the benefit of duty drawback for furnace oil to the manufacturer cannot be treated as an arbitrary fixation of a cut off rate. 5. It can be seen from Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Ext.P11 that inputs consumed in production are inputs physically incorporated, energy, fuels and oil used in the production process and they have to be treated as consumed in the course of....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI