2016 (11) TMI 535

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ao Assessee by : Shri Nitesh Joshi ORDER Per S. Rifaur Rahman, A. M. This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax(A) - 5, Hyderabad, dated 28/03/2016 for AY 2009-10. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee company, engaged in the business of cultivation of land, sowing, irrigation and production and sale of seeds,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y industries, suvidha graphics & printers, aksharent) 9,51,894 Total 89,16,387/-. 2.2 The AO observed that no TDS was made by the assessee on the said payments. He, therefore, disallowed the said amount u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). 4. Before the CIT(A), the assessee contended that the payment made by it towards promot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wance should be restricted to Rs. 15,22,373/-, which is outstanding at the end of the year i.e. outstanding as on 31 March, 2015. 5. The ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions of the assessee and following the various case laws including the special bench decision of the ITAT in the case of Merlyn Shipping & Transports Vs. Addl. CIT, [2012 136 ITD 0023 (SB), held that the liability to ded....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cer submitted that the CIT(A) is not proper in sustaining the outstanding amount of Rs. 15,22,373/- out of the addition of Rs. 89,16,387/-. 9. Ld. AR, on the other hand besides relying on the order of the CIT(A) relied on the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. Janapriya Engineers Syndicate, 371 ITR 439 (AP) 2. ACIT Vs. Warangal Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., [2016] 73 Taxmann.com 2....