2016 (11) TMI 162
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tice KS Jhaveri ) 1. By way of this appeal, the assessee has challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, (For short, "the Tribunal") in M.A.No.12/RJT/05 arising out of ITA No.4073/Ahd/95 dated 12.5.2005, whereby the review preferred by the assessee was dismissed. 2. At the time of admitting this Appeal, following question of law was framed:- "(i) Whether in the fac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fundamental principle that justice is above all. It is exercised to remove the error and to disturb the finality. 46. In S. Nagaraj & Ors. v. State of Karnataka, 1993 Supp (4) SCC, Sahai, J. stated; "Justice is a virtue which transcends all barriers. Neither the rules of procedure nor technicalities of law can stand in its way. The order of the Court should not be prejudicial to anyone. Rule....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....her statutory or inherent. The latter is available where the mistake is of the Court. In Administrative Law, the scope is still wider. Technicalities apart if the Court is satisfied of the injustice then it is its constitutional and legal obligation to set it right by recalling its order". 47. In the present case, according to the assessee, the Tribunal decided the matter on October 27, 2000. H....