Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (10) TMI 667

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sekaran, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT [Judgment per : V. Ramasubramanian, J.]. - The assessee has come up with the above appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 challenging an order of the second respondent herein refusing to condone the delay of about 250 days in filing the appeal. 2. Heard Mr. Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellant/ assessee and Mr. T. Chan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....did not receive the order in appeal from the office of the Commissioner. They also vacated the premises in December 2013 after closure of the business. But, they received a communication from their advocate on 24-7-2014. This communication did not include a copy of the order. Therefore, the appellant claims that they got the copy of the order and came to know about its contents only on 23-12-2014.....