Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2008 (8) TMI 942

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Member (J) and Shri T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) Shri Venkateswara Rao, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri K. Sambi Reddi, Authorised Representative (JDR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The Miscellaneous Application seeks to implead the legal heirs of the late Proprietor of M/s. Vinayaka Agencies. The said application is also allowed. 2.&ems....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upathi - 2007 (210) E.L.T. 171 (S.C.) rejected the Revenue appeal in the case of CCE v. Crane Betel Nut Powder Works (supra). The Revenue was directed to get comments with regard to applicability of the judgments. 3. The learned DR reiterates the department's submission, although he submits that the judgment of Supreme Court has applicability to the facts of the case. 4. We find th....

PrevPreviousNextNext