2015 (2) TMI 1191
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....appearing for Mr. Harin P. Raval for the appellant and Mr. Kuntal Parikh for Mr. Paresh M. Dave, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. While admitting this appeal on 19-12-2007, the following substantial questions of law were formulated : "(a) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in holding that the goods were not lia....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e appellant, show cause notice was issued and the respondent was called upon to show as to why Polyester Dyed Piled Fabrics amounting to Rs. 26,50,819.42 should not be confiscated. The said notice was adjudicated by the Commissioner (Adjudication) Central Excise, Ahmedabad vide Order-in-Original dated 27-4-2005 and ordered confiscation of Polyester Dyed Piled Fabrics amounting to Rs. 26,50,819.42.....
TaxTMI