Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1994 (7) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT [1966] 62 ITR 566. We gone through the judgment and on first impression it may appear to be so. But the problem in the case is that the first question framed by the learned Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is as follows (see [1977] 109 ITR 667, 669) : "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting-- Rs. 3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... parties. " Therefore, the case of Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. [1966] 62 ITR 566 (SC) cannot assist us in arriving at a decision. Once the finding is given by the Tribunal as finding of fact, namely, that the amount in dispute was really relatable to acquisition of a capital asset, the question of conversion to revenue expenditure does not arise. In fact, one cannot follow such a decis....