2006 (2) TMI 667
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....P.M.P.Nos.1347 and 1348 Of 2006 - -<br>Indian Laws<br>-<br>MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI For the Petitioner : Mr.M.MD.Ibrahim Ali For the Respondent : Mr.A.Baskar ORDER Mr. A. Baskar, learned standing counsel for TNEB takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed challenging the order of the third respondent dated 28.01.2006, in so far as the levy of BPSC charges, a ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fairly accept that when the matter was pending before the Court, it may not be proper to have demanded the belated payment towards collection of the charges. 7. In view of that, the third respondent can only claim the peak hour charges of ₹ 1,12,384/-. Therefore, the impugned order, in so far as, it includes the BPSC will be set aside and consequently, the petitioner will be liable to pay a....