2016 (10) TMI 124
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, AGP O R D E R Heard Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. By consent of the learned Counsel appearing for both sides, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner challenges the goo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Andhra Pradesh and they were directed to Mangalore and the place of delivery at Mangalore is not disclosed specifically and the purchaser at Mangalore had taken delivery of the goods from the lorry shed. 4. The petitioner's further case is that for such type of transaction, a quasi-purchasing Form LL, i.e., from the consigner is required, as the goods are unable to enter the State of Tamil N....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ced the Online generated Form-JJ and Form-LL. 5. The learned Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the petitioner is not required to produce Form-LL on account of the fact that they are buyer and they have now generated Online Form-LL dated 19.09.2016. 6. The respondent has produced the original files which have been placed before this Court by the learned Additional Government Pleader and....