2016 (9) TMI 1091
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....vedita Kundaji and Mr. Chirag Chanani i/b. M/s. Dewani and Associates for the petitioner Mr. M. S. Bharadwaj with Mr. V. P. Verma, Mr. Vivek Sharma for the respondent ORDER P. C. We have heard both sides and perused the affidavit in reply and rejoinder. Since prima facie some arguable questions are raised, we proceed to admit the writ petition. Hence, Rule. Respondents waive service. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sued with actual user condition. They were aware of this condition. The finding is that the petitioner company not only created certain false documents to show transportation and processing of corn, but also sold the imported corn. In the further portion of the impugned order, there is a clear finding that the petitioner company had a malafide intention and indulged in this act through creation of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ds, then, the respondents would be obliged to abide by the orders in the writ petition. We clarify that the tentative and prima facie opinion of the competent authority or the appellate authority shall not influence the Bench while finally deciding the writ petition. 5) Hearing expedited. 6) At this stage Mr. Nankani prays that the ad-interim order be continued for a period of four weeks so as t....