2016 (9) TMI 951
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Vani H. Adv For the Respondent : Sri. K. V. Aravind ORDER Petitioner has approached this court in ITA No.699/2009 challenging the order passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.698/Bang/2008 dated 12.6.2009. This court by its order dated 17.11.2015 allowed the appeal and formulated the substantial questions and 3 the same has been answered against the revenue and consequently the order of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fund of the tax collected with interest. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that because of the technical reasons the same has not been done he submitted that if some time is granted , the same would be repaid. 4. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. 5. When an appeal is allowed and answered the substantial questions against the revenue, it is duty on the revenue ....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI