1967 (3) TMI 15
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Calcutta, drew up a statement of case under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act and submitted the following question to the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta : " Whether, under the facts and circumstances, and on the materials available, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the gain of Rs. 49,400 made by the sale of 200 shares of Radha Films Limited was a venture in t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he 25th October, 1960. The reference was again placed for hearing before a Division Bench of the High Court. The learned judges by their judgment dated June 21, 1963, answered the question that the gain was of a capital nature and was not income from business taxable under the Indian Income-tax Act. The High Court having declined to grant a certificate under section 66A of the Indian Income-tax Ac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd evidence as may already be on the record but which has not been included in the statement of the case made initially under section 66(1) or section 66(2). It has no jurisdiction to direct the Appellate Tribunal to collect additional material and make it a part of the supplementary statement. " It was certainly open to the High Court to call for a supplementary statement of case under section....
TaxTMI