2016 (9) TMI 241

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....& 50424 of 2016 - Final Order No. 52745-52749/2016<br>Service Tax<br>Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) and Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Shri BL Narasimhan, Advocate for the Appellants Shri Ranjan Khanna, AR for the Respondent ORDER All the matters are being disposed of by a common order as the issue involved in all of them is identical. 2. All the appellants entered in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4.&nbsp; Hence the present appeal. 5.&nbsp; After hearing both sides duly represented by Shri B L Narasimhan, learned Advocate appearing for the appellants and Shri Ranjan Khanna, learned DR appearing for the Revenue and after going through the impugned orders, we find that the dispute between the assessees and the Revenue lies on the legal issue i.e. whether the services of transporting t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....harge basis. The Revenue in that case, had raised the demand by treating the services as &#39;mining services&#39;. The Tribunal after taking into account overall facts and circumstances of the case including the Tribunal&#39;s decision in the case of Arjuna Carriers P Vt. Ltd. vs. CCE & ST, Raipur vide Final Order No. 54920/2014-Cu(DB) dated 20.11.2014, held as under: "6. In the light of....