2016 (8) TMI 1025

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Technical) Shri A.P. Mathur, Advocate, and Shri Abhishek Jaju, Advocate for Appellants Shri A.K. Goswami, Additional Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER These two appeals were initially disposed through final order No. 560-61/06-CE dated 12.07.06. Subsequently, through miscellaneous Order No. 59068-59069/2013 dated 27/08/13, both the appeals were restored. 2. Brief facts of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 53,37,815/- availed on rubber was disallowed holding that the appellants has procured more inputs than required by them and therefore, the said credit was liable to be denied to them. Further, cenvat credit of Rs. 1,47,648/- and cenvat credit of Rs. 2,04,683/- were disallowed. The appellants were imposed with penalty of Rs. 56,90,146/- on the assessee and personal ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....notice that input was cleared as such clandestinely. The only allegation is that the wastage of input was more than expectation of the adjudicating authority and therefore, cenvat credit was denied by original authority. He further argued that formerly Rule 57D of central Excise Rules, 1944 provided that cenvat credit shall not be denied on any quantity of input going into waste. There is no provi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... entered the factory premises and inputs are used in the manufacture of final products that they are not cleared as such. We do not find any allegation in the show cause notice that the appellants had not procured the inputs nor that the inputs had not suffered Central Excise duty nor that the input were cleared as such by the appellant. In fact there is no investigation in respect of above stated....