2016 (8) TMI 1018
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sed Representative ORDER Heard both sides. 2. This is an appeal filed against OIO No 29/COMMR/2008 dt 28.3.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad III. 3. The Ld Advocate for the appellant submitted that the Appeals filed by the manufacturer M/s Sampat Aluminium Pvt Ltd. and other persons had been decided by this Tribunal vide order No A/445-447/WZB/AHD/2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pellant is too harsh. 4. The Ld Authorised Representative for the Revenue, on the other hand submitted that the Shri B R Shah, authorized signatory of M/s B R Overseas has categorically admitted the sale of 316.850 MT manufactured and cleared without payment of duty by the manufacturer, hence the Adjudicating Authority has rightly imposed penalty against the appellan....