2016 (2) TMI 925
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Ms. Sukriti Das, Advocate for the Respondent. Per. B. Ravichandran :- This appeal by Revenue is against order dated 07/11/2006 of Commissioner (Appeals - II), Jaipur. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of Cement and Clinker liable to Central Excise duty. It was found that they have cleared various types of waste and scrap of metal during January to September 2004 without pay....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....red as manufactured product liable to Central Excise duty. The learned AR reiterated the grounds of appeal. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent submitted that there is nothing in the present appeal to change the findings of the lower Authorities. In fact, the very same grounds of appeal were considered by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) while passing the impugned order. 4. We have heard....