2016 (8) TMI 886

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Gajera, Advocate For Respondent (s) : Shri T. K. Sikdar, AR ORDER Heard both sides. 2.  This miscellaneous application is filed seeking condonation of delay of one year ten months i.e. 665 days(approx.) in filing the appeal before this Tribunal.  Explaining the cause of delay, the Ld. Advocate submitted that even though the impugned Order dt.03.05.2013  was communicated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Revenue submits that from the explanation furnished and also in  the affidavit of Sh. Satish M. Mahyavanshi  it is clear that the delay was due to sheer negligence on the part of the Appellant, hence cannot be condoned in view of principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of The Chief Post Master General vs. Living Media India Ltd. 2012 (277) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.). 4.....