Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (3) TMI 91

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., J ] -1. The short question in the present appeal is as to whether the Income Tax appellate Tribunal (for short as "Tribunal") was right in deleting addition of Rs.15 lacs made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short as "Act") by the Assessing Officer. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the Assessee filed return of income for the assessment year 1999-2000 on 27^th December, 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the order of CIT(A), the Revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal, that is, ITA No.1527/Del/2003 for the assessment year 1999-2000 and the same was dismissed by the Tribunal, Delhi Bench "E" vide the impugned order. 5. It has been contended by learned counsel for the Revenue that despite several opportunities, the Assessee had failed to file confirmation from Bhai Manjeet Singh and, therefo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ch sum, or (ii) The explanation offered by him is, in the opinion of the Assessing Officer, not satisfactory. 8. Here, the CIT(A) has deleted the addition of Rs.15 lacs mainly on the ground that this credit balance of Rs.15 lacs is being reflected in the accounts of the Assessee over the past four to five years or so and hence this was not a fresh credit entry of the previous year under cons....