2016 (8) TMI 847

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....A. For the Respondent : Shri B. Kumar Iyer, Supdt. (AR) ORDER Per Raju The appellant, M/s Kolland Developers Pvt. Ltd., are developer of SEZ. The appellant filed a refund claim in respect of services availed by them in terms of Notification No. 12/2013-ST dated 1.7.2013. The said notification provided exemption from the duty by way of refund to developer of SEZ. Clause 3(I) of the exe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... STR 841 (Tri-Mum) wherein the Tribunal has observed as follows: - "6. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. It is noted that Notification No. 9/2009 does not state that the list of services required in relation to authorized operations in the SEZ should be got approved from the approval committee before providing the services. The appellants have pointed out tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....argument that the said notification is an exemption notification and therefore at the time to avail the exemption, the conditions of notification have to be fulfilled, was not taken by the Revenue. In the instant case, I find that the Notification No. 12/2013 provides the exemption by way of refund. To avail the exemption, the assessee must fulfill the conditions of the notification at the time of....