2016 (8) TMI 631
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Sharma, Authorized Representative (DR) - for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is contesting the order-in-appeal dated 04/01/2016 of Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur. In the said order the learned Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the original order of the Superintendent who disallowed the Cenvat credit of Rs. 21,201/- availed by the appellant on GTA services used for transportation of pet coke ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r No. 51895-51899/2016 dated 27/05/2016. 3. The learned AR reiterated the findings of the lower Authorities. 4. After examining the appeal papers, I find that an identical issue has come up for decision by the Tribunal in Hindustan Zinc Limited vs. CCE & ST, Jaipur - II (supra). It was held after examining the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Maruti Suzuki Ltd. vs. CCE, Delhi I....
TaxTMI