2016 (8) TMI 476
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....R.Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner challenges the order of the respondent dated 01.06.2016 on the ground that the respondent has no jurisdiction to revise the assessment on the basis of the Web-report obtained behind the back of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent being a quasi-judicial authority ought not to ha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mit his explanation in due course. Accordingly, Annexure-II was given to the petitioner on 22.01.2016 and he was requested to give his reply against the proposal in the next 15 days. However, he has failed to do so forcing the Department to once again remind him about the case and file his reply on or before 20.04.2016. But, for the best reason known to him, he has not filed any reply paving a way....
TaxTMI