2016 (8) TMI 442

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri N.N. Prabhudesai, Supdt. (A.R) ORDER The appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. AKP/164/NSK/2010 dt. 31.5.2010 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise & Customs, Nashik, whereby the Ld. Commissioner rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. The fact of the case is that the present appellant is partner of the partnership firm M/s. Shri Gajanan Re-Rolling Mills. The ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....heque. Regarding transportation, he stated that it was free delivery at their factory gate and transportation was arranged by their suppliers. He also stated that his firm has reversed the entire Cenvat Credit initially under protest subsequently the protest was withdrawn. The appellant was imposed penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules. Against the adjudication order, th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orrect. In support of his submission he placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs (E.P.) Vs. Jupiter Exports 2007 (213) ELT 641 (Bom.) 4. On the other hand, Shri N. N. Prabhudesai, Ld. Superintendent (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He submits that the present appellant was pena....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....how cause notice, admittedly paid the amount of wrongly availed Cenvat Credit. The allegation was that the waste and scrap which is covered under the cenvatable invoices are not in the nature, which can be used for the purpose of rerolling in the manufacture of the final product. I find that the present appellant has shown his ignorance about the nature of the product. From the statement it is rev....