2008 (2) TMI 77

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ver. The dispute relates to Service Tax for the period May to September, 2005. The case of the appellant/assessee is that excess payment had been made in the month of April, 2005 which could be adjusted against the tax liability for the period in question and, therefore, there was nothing outstanding against the appellant. Reference was made to provisions of sub-rule (3) of Rule 6 of the Central E....