2016 (8) TMI 122

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Sourabh Bhutra, Advocate for the Appellant Shri A.K.Biswas, Supdt.(AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Shri H. K. Thakur This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant against Order-in-Original No.19/COMMR/Denovo/2006 dated 29.11.2006 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur as adjudicating authority. 2. Shri Ravi Raghavan (Advocate) and Shri Sourabh Bhutra (Advocate) ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... contesting Rs. 55,170/-(Rupees Fifty Five Thousand One Hundred and Seventy only) which has been reversed under entry No.2460 dated 01.11.1999 in their RG-23A part-II record. That the remaining credit of Rs. 1,26,992/-(Rupees One Lakh Twenty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety Two only) is being contested. That an amount of Rs. 1,61,740/-(Rupees One Lakh Sixty One Thousand Seven Hundred and Forty....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....acture of motor vehicles. Ld.Advocate relied upon the following case laws of this Bench in their own case in support of his arguments :- (i) Tata Motors Ltd. v. CCE, JSR [2011 (264) ELT 385 (Tri.-Kol)] (ii) Tata Motors Ltd. v. CCE, JSR [2010 (252) ELT 265 (Tri.-Kol)] 2.1 Regarding defective duty paying documents, ld.Advocate argued that correct classification and description o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....entral Excise Rules, 1944 and has been correctly availed. 3. Shri A.K.Biswas, Supdt.(AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that correct description was not given in the duty paying documents and also that the inputs are not directly used in the manufacture of finished goods. Ld.AR strongly defended the Order-in-Original passed by the adjudicating authority. 4. Heard both sides and pe....